| |

Hubert Gammer, President of Gammer Group
International, Inc.
|
|
CRISIS
AND OPPORTUNITY
H. Gammer - Part II Opportunity
- The Business Builders
Will the protracted crisis affect strategic thinking in corporate
board rooms? If so, how?
It stands to reason that the strategic thinkers of the corporate
world might even benefit from the crisis, while the strategic laggards
may face heightened risks of failure.
Before analyzing the new sets of strategic challenges that companies
are facing, a brief discussion of the concept of USP may be in order.
USPs (unique selling propositions) are characteristics that give
companies competitive advantages over its peers. The concept of
USP can comprise any or more of the following qualities: brand name,
superior product characteristics, leading-edge technology, superior
design, worldwide locations, access to difficult markets and others.
Typically, USPs are reflected in high gross margins and above average
price elasticity of the company’s products: if a company can
manage to maintain high margins and to raise its prices in times
of inflationary material costs it clearly has competitive advantages
over its peers. If a company cannot maintain its margins in times
of rising material costs, it does not have USPs. If a company’s
products feature all kinds of bells and whistles while the margins
are falling in times of rising costs, the company does not have
a USP, because the market does not perceive all those wonderful
new things on the products as useful or needed.
As we enter the new era of uncertain economic times it is important
that companies understand what their competitive position is: drawing
the wrong conclusions or ignoring the subject may result in dire
consequences.
|
|
October
2008
M & A Digest
Main Page |
|
| |
|
|
What types of companies
will emerge as winners or losers from the reshuffled Deck?
• “Natural winners ” will be companies with product/market
USPs and strong market access in the major industrial and BRIC countries.
They may accelerate their growth by picking up competitors that
help them fill some product/market gaps or push more products through
the same channels etc. This group of companies will continue to
be a strong force on the M&A market. If they do it right these
companies will be the new kings of market-share.
• Companies boasting some, but not all of these elements will
have to scramble to complement their line-up of advantages so as
to keep up with the Natural Winners.
• Strong niche players will continue to prosper as long as
they remain within their narrowly defined niches and can successfully
defend their advantages. However, niches tend to disappear after
some time.
• Companies with multiple product lines may want to focus
on their strengths and divest themselves of some of their less successful
products so as not to dilute their overall performance.
Is everybody else bound to disappear? Of course, not.
There will always be small suppliers (and even large contract manufacturers)
that benefit form their proximity to their customers or from economies
of scale of mass-producing.
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
The remaining companies,
a rather large group, consists of manufacturers without significant
USPs, which in recent good times would have had single-digit EBITs,
will see their profitability drop sometimes way into negative territory.
Main reason: if the pie does not grow any more, but remains flat
or if it even shrinks, pressures on prices increase. While it is
painful for companies with double-digit EBITs to cut their prices
and profitability they can survive with single-digit EBITs. But
if you are already in the single-digits you do not have any room
for flexibility any more. You can cut prices and absorb the losses
– but how long can you do that?
Quick action is needed. The sensible thing could be to find a (larger)
partner company as long as it is not too late.
|
|
|
|